← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reed Stark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 21 2 3 5 0.238 0.0875 0.0909 0.2513 0.2611
2019-20 NAHL 20 4 8 12 0.600 0.2204 0.2204 0.6333 0.6333
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 47 12 20 32 0.681 0.2502 0.2502 0.7187 0.7187
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 16 7 6 13 0.812
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 14 5 2 7 0.500
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 24 10 9 19 0.792
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2021-22 · Wisconsin-Superior
+917.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24994
Forward overall
#1190
Forward born in 2000
#1986
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2018-19
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2019-20
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.