IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Westbrook Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pine City Area USHS-MN 24 11 12 23 0.958 0.2580 0.2715 0.2328 0.2450
2018-19 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 35 8 19 27 0.771 0.2182 0.2116 0.4861 0.4714
2019-20 — NAHL 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0512 0.0512 0.1460 0.1460
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 19 1 4 5 0.263
2022-23 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27438
Forward overall
#1168
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Prattson
Trinity · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Crowe
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.