← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Westbrook Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pine City Area USHS-MN 24 11 12 23 0.958 0.1213 0.1276 0.2328 0.2450
2018-19 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 35 8 19 27 0.771 0.1485 0.1440 0.4864 0.4717
2019-20 NAHL 29 1 3 4 0.138 0.0507 0.0507 0.1456 0.1456
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 19 1 4 5 0.263
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36713
Forward overall
#2009
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.