IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Valure Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hermantown High USHS-MN 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.2261 0.2323 0.2040 0.2096
2018-19 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 19 12 8 20 1.053 0.1417 0.1344 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC — 17 3 4 7 0.412
2017-18 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — FR 17 3 4 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2017-18 · Concordia
+107.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23421
Forward overall
#952
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Anders Bjork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gambrell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (1.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Larkin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Stevens
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Murray
Daniel Webster · 2009-10
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bo Webster
Hobart · 2008-09
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Phaneuf
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.