← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Korpi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 NAHL 32 5 7 12 0.375 0.1486 0.1486 0.3937 0.3937
2020-21 NAHL 44 16 16 32 0.727 0.2882 0.2882 0.7636 0.7636
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 40 13 26 39 0.975 0.3863 0.3689 1.0237 0.9775
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC SR 17 3 0 3 0.176
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC JR 18 6 2 8 0.444
2023-24 Union D1 ECAC SO 35 10 3 13 0.371
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC FR 31 6 4 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Union
+2.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15554
Forward overall
#705
Forward born in 2001
#796
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.