| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Bismarck Bobcats | NAHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | — | NAHL | 32 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.375 | 0.1486 | 0.1486 | 0.3937 | 0.3937 |
| 2020-21 | — | NAHL | 44 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 0.727 | 0.2882 | 0.2882 | 0.7636 | 0.7636 |
| 2021-22 | Oklahoma Warriors | NAHL | 40 | 13 | 26 | 39 | 0.975 | 0.3863 | 0.3689 | 1.0237 | 0.9775 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Union | D1 | ECAC | SR | 17 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.176 |
| 2024-25 | Union | D1 | ECAC | JR | 18 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0.444 |
| 2023-24 | Union | D1 | ECAC | SO | 35 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 0.371 |
| 2022-23 | Union | D1 | ECAC | FR | 31 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.323 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.