← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Carroll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Houston Bulls NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 53 10 8 18 0.340 0.1206 0.1206 0.3565 0.3565
2020-21 NAHL 39 1 5 6 0.154 0.0546 0.0546 0.1615 0.1615
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 32 6 8 14 0.438 0.1554 0.1474 0.4593 0.4356
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA SR 13 3 2 5 0.385
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA SO 14 4 2 6 0.429
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA FR 24 1 7 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Trine
+164.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40693
Forward overall
#2280
Forward born in 2001
#4327
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.