← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Arneson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 NAHL 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0297 0.0297 0.0847 0.0847
2020-21 NAHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 NAHL 53 3 11 14 0.264 0.0981 0.0989 0.2797 0.2820
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 42 0 5 5 0.119 0.0442 0.0424 0.1260 0.1209
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2024-25 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 16 0 3 3 0.188
2023-24 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 20 1 4 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · Saint Mary's
+307.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21074
Defenseman overall
#2702
Defenseman born in 2002
#6567
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2022-23
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2007-08
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2018-19
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.