IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timmy Kent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 11 13 24 0.490 0.1380 0.1456 0.3965 0.4183
2018-19 — NCDC 28 3 19 22 0.786 0.2214 0.2209 0.6361 0.6348
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 37 11 37 48 1.297 0.4817 0.4817 1.3736 1.3736
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE JR 23 15 20 35 1.522
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SO 23 19 12 31 1.348
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE FR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2018-19 New England D3 — — 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2018-19 · New England
+60.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9096
Forward overall
#280
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Sieckhaus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Jones
Becker · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.