← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timmy Kent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 11 13 24 0.490 0.1997 0.2107 0.3937 0.4154
2018-19 NCDC 28 3 19 22 0.786 0.3203 0.3196 0.6315 0.6302
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 37 11 37 48 1.297 0.4766 0.4766 1.3693 1.3693
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE JR 23 15 20 35 1.522
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SO 23 19 12 31 1.348
2020-21 Curry D1 CNE SO 5 1 1 2 0.400
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE FR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2018-19 University of New England D1 CNE FR 10 1 1 2 0.200
2018-19 University of New England D3 CNE 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2018-19 · University of New England
+10.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6964
Forward overall
#296
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2011-12
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.