IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braden Lindstrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chippewa Steel NAHL 35 8 19 27 0.771 0.2864 0.2864 0.8168 0.8168
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 37 7 12 19 0.513 0.1907 0.1907 0.5437 0.5437
2021-22 — NAHL 55 11 26 37 0.673 0.2498 0.2341 0.7123 0.6676
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 27 5 13 18 0.667
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 28 8 15 23 0.821
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 23 4 8 12 0.522
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 28 3 7 10 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · St. Norbert
+78.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15713
Forward overall
#517
Forward born in 2001
#1187
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.