IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emil Gabrielson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-01 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 19 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 40 5 7 12 0.300 0.1184 0.1187 0.4074 0.4084
2018-19 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 42 4 19 23 0.548 0.2161 0.2061 0.7437 0.7092
2019-20 — NAHL 45 10 13 23 0.511 0.1878 0.1878 0.5395 0.5395
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Adrian D1 NCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22832
Forward overall
#1131
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Olitch
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2006-07
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dimitri Voyatzis
Nichols · 2022-23
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.