← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Doyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 28 6 9 15 0.536 0.1968 0.1968 0.5654 0.5654
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 36 1 7 8 0.222 0.0816 0.0816 0.2345 0.2345
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 30 5 11 16 0.533 0.1959 0.1943 0.5629 0.5582
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 52 19 22 41 0.788 0.2897 0.2730 0.8323 0.7844
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA GR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA SR 32 0 8 8 0.250
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA JR 25 0 5 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Bentley
-3.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23668
Forward overall
#1306
Forward born in 2002
#1813
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.