← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan McDowell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 42 4 10 14 0.333 0.1225 0.1225 0.3518 0.3518
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 36 3 10 13 0.361 0.1327 0.1327 0.3811 0.3811
2021-22 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 44 3 10 13 0.295 0.1086 0.1030 0.3119 0.2957
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 24 2 9 11 0.458
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 25 2 6 8 0.320
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 27 7 7 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Stevenson
+433.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12872
Defenseman overall
#2254
Defenseman born in 2001
#4319
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.