IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Elliott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Brampton Capitals OJHL 48 18 19 37 0.771 0.2154 0.2256 0.5319 0.5570
2004-05 Brampton Capitals OJHL 45 17 28 45 1.000 0.2794 0.2785 0.6901 0.6878
2005-06 — OJHL 46 20 19 39 0.848 0.2369 0.2274 0.5851 0.5616
2006-07 Oakville Blades OJHL 48 21 50 71 1.479 0.4133 0.3760 1.0208 0.9287
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 22 1 7 8 0.364
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 15 0 2 2 0.133
2007-08 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2007-08 · SUNY Geneseo
-26.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8752
Forward overall
#343
Forward born in 1986
#317
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.