IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kasyn Kruse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Luverne High USHS-MN 25 22 19 41 1.640 0.2076 0.2257 0.3984 0.4331
2018-19 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 53 8 14 22 0.415 0.0799 0.0803 0.2618 0.2630
2019-20 — MJHL 28 2 6 8 0.286 0.0550 0.0550 0.1802 0.1802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 17 1 1 2 0.118
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 24 3 4 7 0.292
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48201
Forward overall
#2832
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Delezenne
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicolas Haviar
Utica · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Cozine
St. Thomas · 2000-01
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.