IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Whitehouse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 39 0 4 4 0.103 0.0407 0.0407 0.1077 0.1077
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 53 0 7 7 0.132 0.0523 0.0523 0.1387 0.1387
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 54 1 6 7 0.130 0.0513 0.0495 0.1361 0.1313
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 15 0 4 4 0.267
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26195
Defenseman overall
#3613
Defenseman born in 2001
#6729
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Sarmiento
Johnson & Wales · 2011-12
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hammer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Dockery
Norwich · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.