IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Greenway USHS-MN 27 9 21 30 1.111 0.1369 0.1369 0.3499 0.3499
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — NAHL 48 1 5 6 0.125 0.0444 0.0429 0.1312 0.1267
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 27 1 3 4 0.148
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 24 0 2 2 0.083
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 21 1 2 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Gustavus Adolphus
+88.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10385
Defenseman overall
#1965
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ty Ebner
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Coyne
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Ahearn
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.