← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0928 0.0928 0.2647 0.2647
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 40 4 12 16 0.400 0.1485 0.1485 0.4235 0.4235
2021-22 NAHL 61 24 21 45 0.738 0.2739 0.2606 0.7811 0.7431
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 19 1 8 9 0.474
2024-25 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 25 9 8 17 0.680
2023-24 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 22 6 8 14 0.636
2022-23 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 26 5 8 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Amherst
+124.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17547
Forward overall
#601
Forward born in 2001
#1483
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.