| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Corpus Christi IceRays | NAHL | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.0928 | 0.0928 | 0.2647 | 0.2647 |
| 2020-21 | Fairbanks Ice Dogs | NAHL | 40 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.400 | 0.1485 | 0.1485 | 0.4235 | 0.4235 |
| 2021-22 | — | NAHL | 61 | 24 | 21 | 45 | 0.738 | 0.2739 | 0.2606 | 0.7811 | 0.7431 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Amherst | D3 | NESCAC | SR | 19 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.474 |
| 2024-25 | Amherst | D3 | NESCAC | JR | 25 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.680 |
| 2023-24 | Amherst | D3 | NESCAC | SO | 22 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.636 |
| 2022-23 | Amherst | D3 | NESCAC | FR | 26 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.