IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Bradley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-09 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #203  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — USHL 37 3 1 4 0.108 0.0638 0.0694 0.3185 0.3463
2019-20 — USHL 34 7 12 19 0.559 0.3296 0.3296 1.6463 1.6463
2020-21 — USHL 52 22 18 40 0.769 0.4538 0.4538 2.2662 2.2662
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 31 11 11 22 0.710
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 35 10 10 20 0.571
2021-22 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 29 4 5 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2021-22 · UConn
+422.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jared Fiegl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Friesen
Wisconsin-Superior · 2018-19
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Auggie Moore
Saint John's · 2014-15
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2001-02
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.