IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Vieten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 56 5 12 17 0.304 0.1131 0.1131 0.4424 0.4424
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 49 18 25 43 0.878 0.3477 0.3477 0.9214 0.9214
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 47 15 15 30 0.638 0.2529 0.2346 0.6702 0.6217
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA JR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA SO 21 3 1 4 0.191
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Niagara
-54.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20990
Forward overall
#1007
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2005-06
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Dunn
Adrian · 2014-15
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Pisciotta
Endicott · 2014-15
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.