← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikolai Dulak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 27 29 56 1.806 0.2226 0.2226 0.4388 0.4388
2020-21 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 53 12 22 34 0.641 0.2279 0.2279 0.6735 0.6735
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 45 9 21 30 0.667 0.2368 0.2343 0.7000 0.6927
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 50 6 17 23 0.460 0.1634 0.1537 0.4830 0.4543
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 20 6 4 10 0.500
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 11 3 4 7 0.636
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 21 5 7 12 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2023-24 · Hamline
+258.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24510
Forward overall
#1375
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2010-11
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.