← New Search ↗ Social Card

Holt Oliphant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 29 3 6 9 0.310 0.0615 0.0615 0.1414 0.1414
2019-20 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 6 6 12 0.444 0.0880 0.0880 0.2025 0.2025
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 53 12 19 31 0.585 0.2149 0.2149 0.6174 0.6174
2021-22 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 55 18 26 44 0.800 0.2939 0.2777 0.8444 0.7980
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA SR 37 7 9 16 0.432
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA JR 38 2 7 9 0.237
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA SO 38 10 4 14 0.368
2022-23 Air Force D1 AHA FR 27 4 5 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Air Force
+92.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21403
Forward overall
#1051
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.