← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Brimmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 North York Rangers OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 North York Rangers OJHL 52 8 17 25 0.481 0.1444 0.1567 0.3291 0.3572
2019-20 North York Rangers OJHL 49 21 21 42 0.857 0.2575 0.2575 0.5867 0.5867
2020-21 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 47 9 19 28 0.596 0.2360 0.2360 0.6254 0.6254
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 54 20 35 55 1.018 0.4035 0.3894 1.0693 1.0319
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA SR 36 10 15 25 0.694
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA GR 31 9 12 21 0.677
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 32 7 8 15 0.469
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 32 6 11 17 0.531
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2022-23 · Long Island Univ.
+109.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14141
Forward overall
#630
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.