IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Vlasich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Houston Bulls NAHL 49 4 14 18 0.367 0.1349 0.1349 0.3877 0.3877
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 60 7 33 40 0.667 0.2449 0.2305 0.7037 0.6624
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA SR 33 1 3 4 0.121
2024-25 Army D1 AHA JR 33 0 5 5 0.151
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SO 28 0 3 3 0.107
2022-23 Army D1 AHA FR 32 1 1 2 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2022-23 · Army
-71.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5870
Defenseman overall
#1298
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Piccininno
Alvernia · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Redmon
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.