← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Hanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blaine USHS-MN 28 16 15 31 1.107 0.2980 0.2980 0.2689 0.2689
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 36 7 5 12 0.333 0.1238 0.1238 0.3529 0.3529
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 7 19 26 0.441 0.1636 0.1600 0.4666 0.4564
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 12 12 24 0.407 0.1510 0.1403 0.4307 0.4001
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 25 5 4 9 0.360
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 24 12 12 24 1.000
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 24 8 5 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2023-24 · St. Scholastica
+327.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27896
Forward overall
#1200
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.