← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Hanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blaine USHS-MN 28 16 15 31 1.107 0.1402 0.1402 0.2689 0.2689
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 36 7 5 12 0.333 0.1225 0.1225 0.3518 0.3518
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 7 19 26 0.441 0.1619 0.1584 0.4652 0.4550
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 12 12 24 0.407 0.1495 0.1389 0.4294 0.3989
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 25 5 4 9 0.360
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 24 12 12 24 1.000
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 24 8 5 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2023-24 · St. Scholastica
+331.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34843
Forward overall
#2089
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Beloit · 2024-25
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.