← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaden Milles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 26 14 6 20 0.769 0.2071 0.2071 0.1868 0.1868
2020-21 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 19 12 10 22 1.158 0.3117 0.3117 0.2813 0.2813
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 47 10 5 15 0.319 0.1779 0.1737 0.2580 0.2519
2024-25 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 28 15 14 29 1.036 0.2382 0.2183 0.3281 0.3007
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC FR 21 3 5 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · Beloit
+122.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22987
Forward overall
#1267
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2024-25
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.