← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Howard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 31 2 2 4 0.129 0.0511 0.0511 0.1354 0.1354
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 56 18 24 42 0.750 0.2972 0.2987 0.7874 0.7914
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 60 32 22 54 0.900 0.3566 0.3409 0.9449 0.9034
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA GR 37 4 4 8 0.216
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA SR 18 1 2 3 0.167
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA JR 26 4 5 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Augustana
+24.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19003
Forward overall
#1025
Forward born in 2002
#1186
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.