IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

P.J. Neal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 10 1 1 2 0.200 0.0710 0.0710 0.2100 0.2100
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0995 0.1027 0.2940 0.3034
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 17 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 3 1 0 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Bowdoin
+279.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38615
Forward overall
#2401
Forward born in 2003
#4020
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Allen
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Curtis
Castleton · 2003-04
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Udahl
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.767 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.