IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Ryder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 40 0 2 2 0.050 0.0178 0.0178 0.0525 0.0525
2021-22 — NAHL 55 2 5 7 0.127 0.0452 0.0440 0.1337 0.1301
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 26 4 7 11 0.423
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 18 0 1 1 0.056
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 16 1 2 3 0.188
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 23 1 1 2 0.087
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Superior
+109.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28262
Defenseman overall
#3818
Defenseman born in 2001
#6822
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Donohue
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Magus
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Faggas
Babson · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.