← New Search ↗ Social Card

Killian Rowlee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.0372 0.0398 0.1145 0.1226
2019-20 Brockville Braves CCHL 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0465 0.0465 0.1659 0.1659
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0710 0.0710 0.2100 0.2100
2021-22 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 53 14 11 25 0.472 0.1156 0.1050 0.3229 0.2933
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE SR 23 14 5 19 0.826
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE JR 19 7 8 15 0.789
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SO 22 11 4 15 0.682
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE FR 19 3 0 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2022-23 · Curry
+133.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43665
Forward overall
#2508
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.