IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Cleary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 23 1 0 1 0.043 0.0155 0.0155 0.0457 0.0457
2021-22 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 60 10 13 23 0.383 0.1361 0.1333 0.4024 0.3940
2022-23 — NAHL 53 11 8 19 0.358 0.1273 0.1184 0.3764 0.3500
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC GR 25 1 5 6 0.240
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 21 3 7 10 0.476
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 20 5 3 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · Connecticut College
+275.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43079
Forward overall
#2717
Forward born in 2002
#4693
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Rock
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Derlago
Utica · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lane Boswell
Marian · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.