← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Dumas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.0772 0.0772 0.1830 0.1830
2019-20 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 15 14 29 1.036 0.1998 0.1998 0.4739 0.4739
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1184 0.1184 0.3499 0.3499
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 59 20 38 58 0.983 0.3492 0.3524 1.0322 1.0416
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 57 17 34 51 0.895 0.3178 0.3051 0.9393 0.9017
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 24 13 13 26 1.083
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 12 2 0 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Sacred Heart
-39.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11554
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.