IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Severi Sulonen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-07 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0710 0.0710 0.2100 0.2100
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 57 3 6 9 0.158 0.0561 0.0562 0.1658 0.1661
2022-23 — NAHL 59 2 14 16 0.271 0.0963 0.0918 0.2847 0.2713
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast GR 27 1 17 18 0.667
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 25 0 12 12 0.480
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 27 2 17 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2023-24 · Plymouth State
+861.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18824
Defenseman overall
#3162
Defenseman born in 2002
#5596
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Docherty
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Foy
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Jahn
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.