IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Doyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — NAHL 32 6 2 8 0.250 0.0888 0.0884 0.2625 0.2613
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 27 8 10 18 0.667
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast — 23 14 10 24 1.044
2023-24 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 22 16 8 24 1.091
2022-23 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 24 7 6 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2022-23 · Johnson & Wales
+615.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46803
Forward overall
#2995
Forward born in 2002
#5265
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Adamsons
Connecticut College · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Stevenson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Harlow
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.