IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Messuri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-24 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NCDC 21 1 2 3 0.143 0.0797 0.0797 — —
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 14 0 5 5 0.357 0.1415 0.1350 0.3749 0.3578
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Strand
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Sullivan
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Bourhas
Colby · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.