← New Search ↗ Social Card

Akhmed Malsagov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-17 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Elite 38 19 24 43 1.132 0.1044 0.1074 0.2591 0.2665
2018-19 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 41 8 18 26 0.634 0.0829 0.0851 0.2152 0.2210
2019-20 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 43 34 40 74 1.721 0.2251 0.2251 0.5841 0.5841
2020-21 Austin Bruins NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 15 0 3 3 0.200
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 21 0 3 3 0.143
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 13 2 1 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2021-22 · Lawrence
+186.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10849
Forward overall
#451
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2010-11
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.