IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gustav Blom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-30 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 AIK U20 SuperElit 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 — SuperElit 33 2 3 5 0.151 0.0598 0.0598 0.2058 0.2058
2020-21 Mora IK U20 SuperElit 11 1 3 4 0.364 0.1435 0.1435 0.4938 0.4938
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 53 6 30 36 0.679 0.2495 0.2321 0.7169 0.6670
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA SR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA JR 26 2 0 2 0.077
2023-24 RIT D1 AHA SO 32 3 7 10 0.312
2022-23 RIT D1 AHA FR 22 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5760
Defenseman overall
#1276
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Schieber
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Splichal
Bethel · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.