| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Albert Lea | USHS-MN | 27 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.889 | 0.2393 | 0.2393 | 0.2159 | 0.2159 |
| 2020-21 | North Iowa Bulls | NA3HL | 37 | 3 | 14 | 17 | 0.460 | 0.1057 | 0.1057 | 0.1456 | 0.1456 |
| 2021-22 | Anchorage Wolverines | NAHL | 54 | 6 | 26 | 32 | 0.593 | 0.2348 | 0.2250 | 0.6222 | 0.5963 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 40 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.350 |
| 2025-26 | Minnesota State | D1 | CCHA | SR | 40 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.350 |
| 2024-25 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | JR | 37 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.216 |
| 2023-24 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | SO | 36 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.111 |
| 2022-23 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | FR | 36 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.056 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.