IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Campbell Cichosz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Albert Lea USHS-MN 27 11 13 24 0.889 0.1125 0.1125 0.2159 0.2159
2020-21 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 37 3 14 17 0.460 0.0577 0.0577 0.1451 0.1451
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 54 6 26 32 0.593 0.2177 0.2087 0.6255 0.5995
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SR 40 4 10 14 0.350
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 37 1 7 8 0.216
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 36 1 3 4 0.111
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 36 0 2 2 0.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2022-23 · Minnesota
-65.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9272
Defenseman overall
#1839
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Bayda
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Santiago
Utica · 2009-10
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Karty
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.