IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Dosan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 32 1 5 6 0.188 0.0510 0.0510 0.1182 0.1182
2020-21 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2719 0.2719 0.6302 0.6302
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 45 12 16 28 0.622 0.2465 0.2310 0.6532 0.6121
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Army D1 AHA JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Army D1 AHA FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33862
Forward overall
#1827
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Mohler
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gramm McCormack
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.