← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rocco Testa-Basi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rockland Nationals CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Collingwood Blues OJHL 15 3 4 7 0.467 0.1144 0.1144 0.3195 0.3195
2020-21 Aurora Tigers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 54 11 16 27 0.500 0.1776 0.1751 0.5250 0.5176
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 24 0 6 6 0.250
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 23 3 3 6 0.261
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 24 8 6 14 0.583
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 22 8 4 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2022-23 · Connecticut College
+263.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32293
Forward overall
#1922
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.