IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Cunningham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-12-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kents Hill NE-Prep 26 1 1 2 0.077 0.0217 0.0217 0.0352 0.0352
2020-21 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 59 5 21 26 0.441 0.1746 0.1701 0.4627 0.4508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA JR 37 7 13 20 0.540
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA JR 40 5 13 18 0.450
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA SO 26 0 5 5 0.192
2022-23 Air Force D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15259
Defenseman overall
#2547
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Roach
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Simm
Chatham · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.