IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Valkama Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 40 8 4 12 0.300 0.0693 0.0693 0.2426 0.2426
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 46 7 18 25 0.543 0.1931 0.1887 0.5706 0.5576
2022-23 — NAHL 46 7 10 17 0.370 0.1313 0.1219 0.3880 0.3601
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC GR 24 4 5 9 0.375
2024-25 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 9 2 3 5 0.556
2023-24 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 17 5 4 9 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2023-24 · Williams
+316.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32495
Forward overall
#1938
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Lyon
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Boyce
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Danilchev
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.