← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Krock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 South Shore Kings NCDC 50 9 16 25 0.500 0.2039 0.2039 0.4019 0.4019
2020-21 South Shore Kings NCDC 33 0 6 6 0.182 0.0741 0.0741 0.1461 0.1461
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 51 6 14 20 0.392 0.1441 0.1349 0.4140 0.3876
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 30 8 14 22 0.733
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 29 15 15 30 1.034
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 22 11 7 18 0.818
2022-23 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 25 5 6 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Hamilton
+281.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32160
Forward overall
#1716
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.