← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Riva Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Berkshire School NE-Prep 26 3 3 6 0.231 0.0445 0.0445 0.1056 0.1056
2019-20 Berkshire School NE-Prep 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.0707 0.0707 0.1678 0.1678
2020-21 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 46 8 8 16 0.348 0.1235 0.1225 0.3652 0.3623
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 9 9 18 0.353 0.1254 0.1182 0.3705 0.3494
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA GR 22 0 2 2 0.091
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 19 1 1 2 0.105
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 18 3 0 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Lake Forest
+62.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40216
Forward overall
#2514
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.