IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sixten Jennersjö Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-18 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 49 4 12 16 0.327 0.1160 0.1208 0.3444 0.3585
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 60 13 26 39 0.650 0.2309 0.2290 0.6856 0.6800
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 60 16 67 83 1.383 0.4915 0.4640 1.4591 1.3775
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA — 33 8 17 25 0.758
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA — 16 4 3 7 0.438
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2024-25 · Long Island Univ.
+38.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11353
Forward overall
#505
Forward born in 2003
#309
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Covelli
Colby · 2004-05
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.