← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Prewitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Worcester Academy NE-Prep 30 5 7 12 0.400 0.0772 0.0772 0.1830 0.1830
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 39 0 9 9 0.231 0.0533 0.0533 0.1866 0.1866
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 54 2 11 13 0.241 0.0855 0.0847 0.2527 0.2502
2022-23 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 60 3 18 21 0.350 0.1243 0.1170 0.3675 0.3458
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE GR 26 2 10 12 0.462
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE SR 29 4 13 17 0.586
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE JR 28 3 9 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2023-24 · Curry
+336.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13738
Defenseman overall
#2627
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.