IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braden Panzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Forks Central (N.D.) USHS-MN 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Minot Minotauros NAHL 56 5 7 12 0.214 0.0761 0.0785 0.2250 0.2320
2022-23 Niverville Nighthawks MJHL 47 15 26 41 0.872 0.1679 0.1626 0.5497 0.5322
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 11 16 27 0.466 0.1653 0.1544 0.4887 0.4565
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 25 5 9 14 0.560
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 24 3 2 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2024-25 · St. Scholastica
+54.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31559
Forward overall
#1875
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Ella
Nichols · 2007-08
0.828 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Lepone
Canton · 2014-15
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Crowe
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.