← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Tushie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Prior Lake USHS-MN 27 8 13 21 0.778 0.0958 0.0958 0.1889 0.1889
2020-21 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 32 17 12 29 0.906 0.1002 0.1002 0.2871 0.2871
2021-22 NAHL 43 4 5 9 0.209 0.0743 0.0732 0.2197 0.2165
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 24 7 9 16 0.667
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 23 10 13 23 1.000
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 26 10 8 18 0.692
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 25 6 7 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+638.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36282
Forward overall
#2219
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2014-15
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.