IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Fizer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New York Apple Core EHL 32 8 5 13 0.406 0.0594 0.0613 0.1992 0.2056
2014-15 New York Apple Core EHL 39 10 19 29 0.744 0.1088 0.1072 0.3646 0.3593
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Castleton D1 — SR 24 6 2 8 0.333
2018-19 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 24 6 2 8 0.333
2017-18 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 24 7 10 17 0.708
2016-17 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 24 4 4 8 0.333
2015-16 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 17 1 4 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Castleton
+287.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26204
Forward overall
#1008
Forward born in 1995
#734
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Domitrovic
Elmira · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Forslund
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.