IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bauer Swift Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0270 0.0270 0.0621 0.0621
2019-20 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 25 2 7 9 0.360 0.0713 0.0713 0.1640 0.1640
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 30 1 6 7 0.233 0.0857 0.0856 0.2462 0.2460
2022-23 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 55 5 13 18 0.327 0.1203 0.1143 0.3455 0.3283
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15138
Defenseman overall
#2785
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Payne
Concordia · 2011-12
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Beckstead
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Hamel
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.