← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Thundercloud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 University School of Milwaukee (Wis.) USHS-MN 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 30 0 9 9 0.300 0.0404 0.0404 0.1021 0.1021
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 34 1 4 5 0.147 0.0546 0.0533 0.1557 0.1521
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0248 0.0230 0.0706 0.0655
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+502.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17450
Defenseman overall
#2353
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2021-22
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.