← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dhillon Wilde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 42 3 11 14 0.333 0.0770 0.0770 0.2695 0.2695
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 33 3 6 9 0.273 0.0630 0.0630 0.2205 0.2205
2021-22 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 10 1 3 4 0.400 0.1421 0.1424 0.4200 0.4210
2022-23 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 53 17 12 29 0.547 0.1944 0.1853 0.5745 0.5477
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC GR 14 2 2 4 0.286
2024-25 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 9 0 4 4 0.444
2023-24 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 19 3 7 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2023-24 · Colby
+265.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18109
Forward overall
#967
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.